Judicial supremacy and the concomitant misguided practice of "nationwide" injunctions necessarily deprive a free people to do exactly that.

La., talks to Fox News Digital about his recent op-ed, and his view on why nationwide injunctions sully the role of the ...

The justices should affirm that there's only one court meant to make nationwide injunctions, on birthright citizenship or ...

"Strict Scrutiny" cohost Leah Litman has the profile of a person who, in previous eras, would seem like a defender of the ...

You cannot have order without having law. Well, theoretically you could. If everyone just instinctively did the right thing, ...

The Trump administration came to the Supreme Court on Thursday with what it called a “modest” request in its effort to end ...

On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Trump v. CASA, Inc. Though the case arises out of ...

Chief Justice John Roberts reiterated his stance that the U.S. constitutional system only functions with judiciary ...

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Thursday in cases challenging an executive order President Donald Trump signed ...

Will the Supreme Court stop radicals in robes from subverting the president and imperiling the separation of powers via rule ...

How the Supreme Court decides will affect not only birthright citizenship but could make it harder for judges to pause other Trump initiatives.

Federal judges have uniformly cast doubt on Trump’s reading of the Citizenship Clause. Three judges have blocked the order ...