Aug 14 (Reuters) - The Arizona Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled a fetus can be referred to as an "unborn human being" in pamphlets for voters to decide about the constitutional right to an abortion.

“Unborn human being is language that is used frequently by anti-abortion folks and we feel that description falls outside of the law’s requirements that it be neutral,” said Chris Love ...

Therefore, we must assume that “Unborn human beings” are fertilized eggs, the traditional definition of “conception.” The fertilized egg, that we are now calling “unborn human being ...

An informational pamphlet for Arizona voters, who will decide in the fall whether to guarantee a constitutional right to an abortion, can refer to an embryo or fetus as an “unborn human being ...

It is never an easy task to do science with human subjects, and I do not suggest that it should be. It is even harder to do science with unborn human subjects and, again, this is not legitimate cause ...

The ruling drew swift criticism from the ballot measure’s backers, who argued that the phrase “unborn human being” is neither impartial nor objective. They said they were concerned that ...

"The term ‘unborn human being' is packed with emotional and partisan meaning, both for those who oppose abortion and for those who endorse a woman’s right to choose whether to have an abortion ...

The ruling drew swift criticism from the ballot measure's backers, who argued the phrase “unborn human being” is neither impartial nor objective. They said they were concerned that Arizonans ...