There is good news in Friday’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. Rahimi: The Court concluded that at least some people subject to domestic violence restraining orders do not have a ...

We still have a lot of work to do," she said in a statement. The case, known as U.S. v. Rahimi, was the first involving the Second Amendment heard by the court following its landmark June 2022 ...

The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal law that bans guns for those subject to domestic violence restraining orders (DVROs) in the first major test of the Second Amendment at the high court ...

The case, US v. Rahimi, centered on Zackey Rahimi, who—according to case documents—was subjected to a restraining order after publicly beating his girlfriend and then firing shots. Subsequently, in a ...

in the long-awaited decision of the US v Rahimi case. In a majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, eight of the nine justices voted to reject a challenge to Section 922(g)(8 ...

The court sent the challenges to the federal firearms bans back down to a lower court with instructions to review the case in light of their ruling last month in US v. Rahimi. In that case ...

The opinions in U.S. v. Rahimi will help lower courts better judge Second Amendment cases, while also educating the public about the conservative Justices’ serious constitutional thinking.

4th at 448–50, so we do not recite them again here. In his appeal, Rahimi raised only two issues: his facial challenge to § 922(g)(8), and whether the district court erred in imposing his ...

The decision, United States v. Rahimi, was 8–1, with Justice Clarence Thomas the lone dissenter. What the Court didn’t say, but should have, is that the federal law is constitutional because ...