Harper on Wednesday. At the heart of Moore v. Harper is the “independent state legislature theory,” or ISLT, which relies on a fringe interpretation of the elections clause of the US ...

In 2020 the ISLT posed a major threat to our democracy, as its proponents tried to use the premise to allow state legislatures to overturn the will of the voters in decisive Electoral College states.

Take advantage of these top-ranked, best-performing and well-managed mutual funds to maximize your retirement portfolio returns. Adding these three top-ranked, best-performing, and well-managed ...

Harper case and decided to examine an obscure doctrine known as the independent state legislature theory (ISLT). If the justices rule in North Carolina's favor and legitimize the theory ...

The case, Moore v. Harper, grew out of a contested North Carolina redistricting process, but has since become shorthand for the independent state legislature theory (ISLT), a right-wing idea that ...

But North Carolina Republicans decided to use this case to achieve a broader GOP ambition: the revival of a long-discredited doctrine known as the independent state legislature theory, or ISLT.

Republicans are arguing about resurrecting an Independent State Legislature Theory (ISLT) derived from language within the dysfunctional Articles of Confederation Constitution. This is the ...

Harper to decide the validity of a dangerous interpretation of constitutional law known as the independent state legislative theory (ISLT). If the court confirms this once-fringe theory ...